Guide

Best LLMs for 24GB GPUs: RTX 3090 & 4090 Guide (2026)

24GB of VRAM is ideal for running 32B parameter models locally in 2026, offering high-quality quantization for real-world use.

February 23, 2026ยท10 min readยท2,346 words

24GB of VRAM is the sweet spot for running LLMs locally in 2026, allowing 32B parameter models at high-quality quantization โ€” the threshold where open-source models become genuinely useful for real work.

The RTX 3090 and RTX 4090 both offer 24GB of VRAM. The 3090, priced at $500โ€“700 used, is the best value for local AI. The 4090, priced at $1,000โ€“1,600, is 30โ€“40% faster. Both GPUs run the same models; the difference lies in speed, not capability.

This guide covers every model worth running on 24GB, detailing VRAM budgets, speed benchmarks, and recommendations by use case.

Quick Start


curl -fsSL https://ollama.com/install.sh | sh
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b
ollama run qwen2.5:32b

Three commands, and you're running one of the most capable open-source models locally. For a deeper comparison of inference frameworks, see our Ollama vs LM Studio vs llama.cpp guide.

Understanding VRAM Budgets on 24GB

Before selecting models, understand VRAM usage:

Component VRAM Usage
Model weights (varies by quant) 60โ€“95% of total
KV cache (context window) 1โ€“6 GB depending on length
CUDA overhead ~200โ€“500 MB
Usable for model ~21โ€“23 GB

At 4K context, you have ~22โ€“23 GB available for model weights. At 32K context, the KV cache grows, leaving 18โ€“20 GB. Plan accordingly.

Quantization: What Fits and What Doesn't

Quantization compresses model weights to use less memory. Key formats on 24GB:

Quantization Bits/Weight Quality 32B Model VRAM 14B Model VRAM
FP16 16 Perfect ~64 GB โŒ ~28 GB โš ๏ธ
Q8_0 8 Near-perfect ~34 GB โŒ ~15 GB โœ…
Q6_K 6 Excellent ~26 GB โš ๏ธ ~11 GB โœ…
Q5_K_M 5 Very good ~23 GB โš ๏ธ ~10 GB โœ…
Q4_K_M 4 Good ~19 GB โœ… ~8 GB โœ…
Q3_K_M 3 Acceptable ~15 GB โœ… ~6 GB โœ…
Q2_K 2 Degraded ~11 GB โœ… ~4 GB โœ…

The sweet spot for 24GB: 32B models at Q4_K_M or 14B models at Q8/FP16. Avoid running 70B models at Q2 โ€” a 32B model at Q5 often provides better output.

Top Models for 24GB GPUs (2026)

๐Ÿ† 1. Qwen 2.5 32B โ€” The All-Rounder

Spec Value
Parameters 32B
Best Quant (24GB) Q4_K_M (~19 GB) or Q5_K_M (~23 GB, tight)
Context Window 33K tokens
License Apache 2.0
Speed (RTX 4090) ~28โ€“35 tok/s (Q4_K_M)
Speed (RTX 3090) ~18โ€“25 tok/s (Q4_K_M)

The daily driver for most 24GB users. Qwen 2.5 32B at Q4_K_M fits with 5 GB of headroom โ€” enough for 8Kโ€“16K context comfortably. Performance is strong across coding, reasoning, writing, and general chat. Apache 2.0 license allows full commercial use.

At Q5_K_M (~23 GB), quality improves on nuanced reasoning and creative tasks, but context windows are shorter. Worth trying if your use case doesn't need long context.


ollama pull qwen2.5:32b

๐Ÿ’ป 2. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B โ€” Best for Coding

Spec Value
Parameters 32B
Best Quant (24GB) Q4_K_M (~19 GB)
Context Window 33K tokens
License Apache 2.0
Speed (RTX 4090) ~28โ€“35 tok/s
Speed (RTX 3090) ~18โ€“25 tok/s

The coding-specific variant of Qwen 2.5. At Q4_K_M, it produces cleaner, more syntactically correct code than the general model โ€” especially in Python, TypeScript, and Rust. For professional development work, the quality difference compounds across a full coding session.

If you code more than 50% of the time, use the Coder variant. Otherwise, the general model is more versatile.

For more on coding agents, see our build your own AI coding agent guide.


ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:32b

๐Ÿงฎ 3. DeepSeek R1 Distill 14B โ€” Best for Reasoning

Spec Value
Parameters 14B
Best Quant (24GB) FP16 (~28 GB โš ๏ธ) or Q8_0 (~15 GB) โœ…
Context Window 33K tokens
License MIT
Speed (RTX 4090) ~40โ€“55 tok/s (Q8)
Speed (RTX 3090) ~30โ€“40 tok/s (Q8)

DeepSeek's chain-of-thought reasoning model distilled to 14B parameters. At Q8_0 on 24GB, you get near-lossless quality with 9 GB of VRAM to spare โ€” plenty for long context and the extended reasoning traces this model produces.

FP16 technically fits at ~28 GB with aggressive offloading, but inference slows dramatically. Stick with Q8_0 โ€” the quality difference from FP16 is negligible on a 14B model.

This model excels in math competitions, logic puzzles, and tasks requiring step-by-step reasoning.


ollama pull deepseek-r1:14b

โšก 4. Phi-4 14B โ€” Best for Long Documents

Spec Value
Parameters 14B
Best Quant (24GB) Q8_0 (~15 GB)
Context Window 128K tokens
License MIT
Speed (RTX 4090) ~40โ€“55 tok/s
Speed (RTX 3090) ~30โ€“40 tok/s

Microsoft's Phi-4 at Q8_0 leaves 9 GB free โ€” enough to push the 128K context window significantly further than most models. Load entire codebases, research papers, or book-length documents and query them interactively.

The 128K context window is the key differentiator. Most 32B models are limited to 33K. If your use case involves processing long documents, Phi-4 at Q8 is the optimal choice on 24GB.


ollama pull phi4:14b

๐ŸŽจ 5. Gemma 2 27B โ€” Best for Creative Writing

Spec Value
Parameters 27B
Best Quant (24GB) Q5_K_M (~23.5 GB) or Q4_K_M (~19 GB)
Context Window 8K tokens
License Gemma Terms of Use
Speed (RTX 4090) ~25โ€“35 tok/s (Q4_K_M)
Speed (RTX 3090) ~18โ€“25 tok/s (Q4_K_M)

Google's Gemma 2 at Q5_K_M fits tightly on 24GB with minimal headroom. At Q4_K_M, you have comfortable room. The output quality is arguably the most "human" of any open-source model โ€” natural phrasing, fewer repetition loops, better creative range.

The 8K context window is the main limitation. For writing tasks that don't need long context (blog posts, emails, short stories), Gemma 2 is hard to beat.


ollama pull gemma2:27b

๐Ÿ”ฅ 6. Mistral Small 3.1 24B โ€” Best for Speed

Spec Value
Parameters 24B
Best Quant (24GB) Q5_K_M (~20 GB)
Context Window 128K tokens
License Apache 2.0
Speed (RTX 4090) ~35โ€“45 tok/s
Speed (RTX 3090) ~25โ€“35 tok/s

Mistral's small-but-fast model fits comfortably at Q5_K_M with 4 GB to spare. Combines good general performance with 128K context and fast inference. Not the best at any single task, but the best all-around speed-to-quality ratio on 24GB.


ollama pull mistral-small:24b

๐Ÿ‹๏ธ 7. Llama 3.3 70B โ€” The Stretch Pick

Spec Value
Parameters 70B
Best Quant (24GB) Q3_K_M with CPU offload
Context Window 128K tokens
License Llama 3.3 Community
Speed (RTX 4090) ~3โ€“6 tok/s (partial offload)
Speed (RTX 3090) ~2โ€“4 tok/s (partial offload)

You can technically load Llama 3.3 70B at Q3_K_M by offloading layers to system RAM. It works for batch processing and non-interactive tasks where you need maximum intelligence and don't mind waiting.

Be honest with yourself: if you frequently need 70B models at usable speeds, 24GB isn't enough. Consider Apple Silicon with 128GB+ or the NVIDIA DGX Spark.


ollama pull llama3.3:70b

Benchmark Comparison: RTX 4090 vs RTX 3090

All benchmarks at Q4_K_M with 4K context, single-user inference via Ollama:

Model Params VRAM (Q4) RTX 4090 tok/s RTX 3090 tok/s Difference
Mistral Nemo 12B 12B ~7 GB ~55โ€“70 ~40โ€“50 4090 ~35% faster
DeepSeek R1 14B 14B ~8 GB ~50โ€“60 ~35โ€“45 4090 ~40% faster
Phi-4 14B 14B ~8 GB ~50โ€“60 ~35โ€“45 4090 ~40% faster
Mistral Small 24B 24B ~15 GB ~35โ€“45 ~25โ€“35 4090 ~35% faster
Gemma 2 27B 27B ~17 GB ~30โ€“40 ~20โ€“28 4090 ~35% faster
Qwen 2.5 32B 32B ~19 GB ~28โ€“35 ~18โ€“25 4090 ~35% faster
Llama 3.3 70B* 70B ~32 GB* ~5โ€“8* ~3โ€“5* Both slow (offload)

*70B requires CPU offloading โ€” speeds are approximate and depend heavily on system RAM speed.

Takeaway: The RTX 4090 is consistently 30โ€“40% faster per token than the RTX 3090. Both run identical models. The 3090 at $500โ€“700 used is the better value unless you're running inference all day.

Best Model by Use Case

Everyday Chat & General Purpose

โ†’ Qwen 2.5 32B (Q4_K_M) โ€” Versatile, strong across tasks, Apache 2.0 licensed.

Coding & Development

โ†’ Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B (Q4_K_M) โ€” Purpose-built for code. Pair it with Claude Code or Cursor for the ultimate local+cloud coding setup.

Math, Logic & Reasoning

โ†’ DeepSeek R1 14B (Q8_0) โ€” Chain-of-thought reasoning at near-perfect quality. The 14B sweet spot.

Long Document Processing

โ†’ Phi-4 14B (Q8_0) โ€” 128K context window with 9 GB headroom. Load entire codebases or papers.

Creative Writing & Copywriting

โ†’ Gemma 2 27B (Q4_K_M) โ€” Most natural-sounding output. Human-like phrasing.

Speed-Critical Applications

โ†’ Mistral Small 3.1 24B (Q5_K_M) โ€” Fast inference, 128K context, good all-around quality.

Maximum Intelligence (Patience Required)

โ†’ Llama 3.3 70B (Q3_K_M + offload) โ€” For batch processing when you need the absolute best output and can wait.

Most power users keep 3โ€“4 models downloaded and switch by task:


# The 24GB toolkit
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b          # General purpose
ollama pull qwen2.5-coder:32b    # Coding
ollama pull deepseek-r1:14b      # Reasoning (Q8)
ollama pull phi4:14b              # Long documents (Q8, 128K)
ollama pull mistral-nemo:12b      # Quick Q&A (fastest)

Total disk space: ~80 GB. You can only run one at a time on 24GB VRAM, but switching takes seconds with Ollama.

RTX 3090 vs RTX 4090: Which to Buy?

Factor RTX 3090 RTX 4090
VRAM 24 GB GDDR6X 24 GB GDDR6X
Inference Speed Baseline ~35% faster
Price (2026) $500โ€“700 (used) $1,000โ€“1,600
Power Draw 350W 450W
NVENC/Decode Gen 7 Gen 9 (better video)
Memory Bandwidth 936 GB/s 1,008 GB/s
Best For Value. Same models, lower cost. Speed. Daily heavy use.

Our recommendation: Buy a used RTX 3090 unless you run inference for hours daily. The 35% speed difference doesn't justify 2โ€“3ร— the price for most people. The saved money is better spent on RAM (64 GB recommended) or fast NVMe storage.

If you want more than 24GB, the RTX 5090 with 32GB โ€” which unlocks 32B models at Q5_K_M and 14B at full FP16.

NVIDIA RTX 3090 Founders Edition (24 GB) โ€” The undisputed value king for local LLMs. 24GB GDDR6X runs every 32B model at Q4_K_M. Used prices make this the best performance-per-dollar in the market.

โ†’ Check price on Amazon

NVIDIA RTX 4090 Founders Edition (24 GB) โ€” Same 24GB VRAM but 30โ€“40% faster inference. Worth it if you run models all day and value speed over savings.

โ†’ Check price on Amazon

Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD (2 TB) โ€” Fast storage for your model library. 7,450 MB/s reads keep model loading snappy when switching between models.

โ†’ Check price on Amazon

Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 (64 GB, 2ร—32 GB) โ€” 64GB system RAM is essential for CPU offloading when stretching into 70B territory. Also keeps Docker and other tools running smoothly alongside inference.

โ†’ Check price on Amazon

*Disclosure: Links above are affiliate links. ToolHalla may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend hardware we'd actually use.*

FAQ

Q: What is the best LLM to run on a 24GB GPU?

A: Qwen 2.5 32B at Q4_K_M is the sweet spot โ€” it fits comfortably while delivering strong general-purpose performance. For coding, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B at Q4 is the best option. For reasoning, DeepSeek R1 14B at Q8_0 gives near-perfect quality with headroom to spare.

Q: Is the RTX 3090 still worth buying for local AI in 2026?

A: Absolutely. The RTX 3090 remains the best value-per-VRAM-dollar in local AI. At $500โ€“700 used, it gives you the same 24GB VRAM as the RTX 4090 and runs the same models โ€” just 30โ€“40% slower. For most people, the savings far outweigh the speed difference.

Q: Can I run 70B parameter models on a 24GB GPU?

A: Not entirely in VRAM. You can partially offload a 70B model to system RAM, but inference will be very slow (2โ€“6 tok/s). For usable 70B performance, you need 48GB+ VRAM or a unified memory system like Apple Silicon with 128GB+ or the NVIDIA DGX Spark.

Q: What's the difference between Q4_K_M, Q5_K_M, and Q8_0 quantization?

A: These refer to the bit-depth of model weight compression. Q4_K_M uses ~4 bits per weight (smallest, some quality loss), Q5_K_M uses ~5 bits (excellent quality, slightly larger), and Q8_0 uses 8 bits (near-lossless). On 24GB GPUs, Q4_K_M lets you fit larger models; Q5 or Q8 gives better quality on smaller ones.

Q: How much system RAM do I need alongside a 24GB GPU?

A: 32GB is the minimum for comfortable local LLM work. 64GB is recommended โ€” it gives you headroom for CPU offloading (running part of a model in system RAM) and keeps the OS, Docker, and other tools running smoothly alongside inference.

Q: Ollama or llama.cpp โ€” which should I use?

A: Ollama is the easiest way to get started โ€” one command to install, one command to run. llama.cpp gives you more control over quantization, context sizes, and advanced features like speculative decoding. Most people should start with Ollama and move to llama.cpp if they need fine-grained tuning. See our full comparison.

Q: Does the RTX 5090 (32GB) make the 3090/4090 obsolete?

A: Not for everyone. The RTX 5090's 32GB unlocks 32B models at Q5_K_M and 14B at full FP16 โ€” quality levels 24GB cards can't match. But at ~$2,000, it's 3โ€“4ร— the price of a used 3090. If your models fit comfortably in 24GB (and most daily-use models do), the 3090 is still the better value.

*Find the perfect model for your GPU at ToolHalla.ai/models โ€” filter by VRAM and use case.*

*More local AI guides: Best Hardware for Local LLMs ยท RTX 5090 Model Guide ยท Ollama vs LM Studio vs llama.cpp ยท BitNet: LLMs on CPU*

*Last updated: March 2026*

  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 โ€” The RTX 3090 offers excellent performance and 24GB of VRAM, making it a great choice for running large language models locally.
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 โ€” For those needing even more speed, the RTX 4090 provides a significant performance boost while maintaining the 24GB VRAM necessary for running 32B parameter models.
  • Fractal Design Meshify C โ€” A high-quality case that can accommodate powerful GPUs like the RTX 3090 and 4090, ensuring proper cooling and airflow for optimal performance.

๐Ÿ”ง Tools in This Article

All tools โ†’

Related Guides

All guides โ†’
#local-llm#rtx-3090#rtx-4090#24gb-vram#ollama#guide