AidervsContinue.dev

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Aider

Coding Assistants

AI pair programming in your terminal

Full review →Website ↗

Continue.dev

Coding Assistants

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureAiderContinue.dev
CategoryCoding AssistantsCoding Assistants
PricingFree (open-source)Free (open-source)
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
30k
20k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsmacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Git-aware editing
  • ✓ Multi-file changes
  • ✓ Auto-commits
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Voice coding
  • ✓ Linting
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Custom commands
  • ✓ Context providers
Pros
  • + Git-aware (auto-commits changes)
  • + Multi-file editing
  • + Works with any model
  • + Terminal-native
  • + Free and open-source
  • + Open-source Copilot alternative
  • + Works with any model
  • + Custom commands and context
  • + VS Code + JetBrains support
  • + Privacy-friendly
Cons
  • − CLI only (no GUI)
  • − Requires API key setup
  • − Can make unwanted changes
  • − Token costs with large codebases
  • − Less polished than Copilot
  • − Setup required for best experience
  • − Completion quality depends on model
  • − Smaller community
Tags
open-sourcecodingcligitpair-programming
codingopen-sourcevscodejetbrains

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Aider vs Cursor →Continue.dev vs Cursor →Aider vs Claude Code →Continue.dev vs Claude Code →Aider vs Cline →Continue.dev vs Cline →Aider vs Devin →Continue.dev vs Devin →Aider vs GitHub Copilot →Continue.dev vs GitHub Copilot →Aider vs TabbyML →Continue.dev vs TabbyML →