Microsoft AutoGenvsDevin

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Microsoft AutoGen

AI Agent Frameworks

Featured

Framework for building multi-agent conversational AI

Full review →Website ↗

Devin

Coding Assistants

Featured

Autonomous AI software engineer by Cognition

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureMicrosoft AutoGenDevin
CategoryAI Agent FrameworksCoding Assistants
PricingFree (open-source)$500/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
35k
—
PlatformsLinux, macOS, WindowsWeb
Key Features
  • ✓ Multi-agent conversations
  • ✓ Code execution
  • ✓ Human-in-the-loop
  • ✓ Customizable
  • ✓ Group chat
  • ✓ Autonomous coding
  • ✓ Bug fixing
  • ✓ Deployment
  • ✓ Learning from docs
  • ✓ Multi-step planning
Pros
  • + Strong multi-agent conversation support
  • + Code execution built-in
  • + Human-in-the-loop capability
  • + Microsoft backing
  • + Research-grade quality
  • + Fully autonomous coding agent
  • + Own development environment
  • + Can handle end-to-end tasks
  • + Learns from documentation
  • + Impressive demo results
Cons
  • − Complex API for beginners
  • − Heavy dependency tree
  • − Documentation could be better
  • − Resource intensive
  • − $500/mo price point
  • − Closed-source
  • − Real-world performance varies
  • − Limited availability
Tags
multi-agentmicrosoftconversationsopen-source
autonomouscodingagentsoftware-engineer

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Microsoft AutoGen vs OpenClaw →Devin vs OpenClaw →Microsoft AutoGen vs Cursor →Devin vs Cursor →Microsoft AutoGen vs OpenHands →Devin vs OpenHands →Microsoft AutoGen vs Claude Code →Devin vs Claude Code →Microsoft AutoGen vs Cline →Devin vs Cline →Microsoft AutoGen vs GitHub Copilot →Devin vs GitHub Copilot →