Continue.devvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Continue.dev

Coding Assistants

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureContinue.devCody
CategoryCoding AssistantsCoding Assistants
PricingFree (open-source)Free + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
20k
5k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsmacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Custom commands
  • ✓ Context providers
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Open-source Copilot alternative
  • + Works with any model
  • + Custom commands and context
  • + VS Code + JetBrains support
  • + Privacy-friendly
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Less polished than Copilot
  • − Setup required for best experience
  • − Completion quality depends on model
  • − Smaller community
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
codingopen-sourcevscodejetbrains
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Continue.dev vs Claude Code →Cody vs Claude Code →Continue.dev vs OpenAI Codex →Cody vs OpenAI Codex →Continue.dev vs Cursor →Cody vs Cursor →Continue.dev vs Cline →Cody vs Cline →Continue.dev vs Devin →Cody vs Devin →Continue.dev vs GitHub Copilot →Cody vs GitHub Copilot →