Continue.devvsDify

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Continue.dev

Coding Assistants

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains

Full review →Website ↗

Dify

Automation Platforms

Open-source platform for building LLM applications visually

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureContinue.devDify
CategoryCoding AssistantsAutomation Platforms
PricingFree (open-source)Free + Cloud plans
GitHub Stars
20k
✓ More stars
60k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsmacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Custom commands
  • ✓ Context providers
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ RAG engine
  • ✓ Agent framework
  • ✓ Workflow orchestration
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ API-first
Pros
  • + Open-source Copilot alternative
  • + Works with any model
  • + Custom commands and context
  • + VS Code + JetBrains support
  • + Privacy-friendly
  • + Beautiful visual interface
  • + Built-in RAG pipeline
  • + Prompt engineering studio
  • + Self-hostable
  • + Multi-model support
Cons
  • − Less polished than Copilot
  • − Setup required for best experience
  • − Completion quality depends on model
  • − Smaller community
  • − Newer platform, still maturing
  • − Can be complex to self-host
  • − Limited advanced customization
  • − Cloud pricing can add up
Tags
codingopen-sourcevscodejetbrains
open-sourcelow-coderagagentsenterprise

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Continue.dev vs Cursor →Dify vs Cursor →Continue.dev vs Claude Code →Dify vs Claude Code →Continue.dev vs Cline →Dify vs Cline →Continue.dev vs Devin →Dify vs Devin →Continue.dev vs GitHub Copilot →Dify vs GitHub Copilot →Continue.dev vs n8n →Dify vs n8n →