Continue.devvsLetta

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Continue.dev

Coding Assistants

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains

Full review →Website ↗

Letta

AI Agent Frameworks

Build stateful AI agents with long-term memory

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureContinue.devLetta
CategoryCoding AssistantsAI Agent Frameworks
PricingFree (open-source)Free (open-source) + Cloud
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
20k
13k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsLinux, macOS, Docker
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Custom commands
  • ✓ Context providers
  • ✓ Long-term memory
  • ✓ Stateful agents
  • ✓ Tool use
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Self-editing memory
Pros
  • + Open-source Copilot alternative
  • + Works with any model
  • + Custom commands and context
  • + VS Code + JetBrains support
  • + Privacy-friendly
  • + Solves long-term memory problem
  • + Self-editing memory
  • + Stateful agents
  • + Multi-model support
  • + Active research backing
Cons
  • − Less polished than Copilot
  • − Setup required for best experience
  • − Completion quality depends on model
  • − Smaller community
  • − Complex memory management
  • − Performance overhead
  • − Rebranding confusion
  • − Still experimental
Tags
codingopen-sourcevscodejetbrains
memorystatefulagentsopen-source

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Continue.dev vs OpenClaw →Letta vs OpenClaw →Continue.dev vs Claude Code →Letta vs Claude Code →Continue.dev vs OpenAI Codex →Letta vs OpenAI Codex →Continue.dev vs Cursor →Letta vs Cursor →Continue.dev vs OpenHands →Letta vs OpenHands →Continue.dev vs Microsoft AutoGen →Letta vs Microsoft AutoGen →