Continue.devvsMake (Integromat)

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Continue.dev

Coding Assistants

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains

Full review →Website ↗

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureContinue.devMake (Integromat)
CategoryCoding AssistantsAutomation Platforms
PricingFree (open-source)Free + Core $9/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
20k
—
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsWeb
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Custom commands
  • ✓ Context providers
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ 1500+ integrations
  • ✓ AI modules
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Data stores
  • ✓ Error handling
Pros
  • + Open-source Copilot alternative
  • + Works with any model
  • + Custom commands and context
  • + VS Code + JetBrains support
  • + Privacy-friendly
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
Cons
  • − Less polished than Copilot
  • − Setup required for best experience
  • − Completion quality depends on model
  • − Smaller community
  • − Pricing based on operations
  • − Can be expensive at scale
  • − Learning curve for advanced features
  • − Some integrations limited
Tags
codingopen-sourcevscodejetbrains
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Continue.dev vs Claude Code →Make (Integromat) vs Claude Code →Continue.dev vs OpenAI Codex →Make (Integromat) vs OpenAI Codex →Continue.dev vs Cursor →Make (Integromat) vs Cursor →Continue.dev vs Cline →Make (Integromat) vs Cline →Continue.dev vs Devin →Make (Integromat) vs Devin →Continue.dev vs GitHub Copilot →Make (Integromat) vs GitHub Copilot →