FirecrawlvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Firecrawl

Data & ETL

Turn websites into LLM-ready markdown or structured data

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

FeatureFirecrawlCody
CategoryData & ETLCoding Assistants
PricingFree (open-source) + CloudFree + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars
More stars
20k
5k
PlatformsLinux, macOS, Docker, WebmacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • Web scraping
  • Markdown conversion
  • Crawling
  • JavaScript rendering
  • API
  • Codebase context
  • Code search
  • Autocomplete
  • Chat
  • Multi-repo
Pros
  • + LLM-optimized output
  • + Handles JavaScript sites
  • + Clean markdown conversion
  • + API + self-hosted options
  • + Fast crawling
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • Cloud pricing per page
  • Self-hosted needs resources
  • Some sites block crawlers
  • Rate limiting on free tier
  • Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • Smaller model selection
  • Enterprise pricing
  • Less known than Copilot
Tags
scrapingwebmarkdownopen-source
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons