Make (Integromat)vsSemantic Kernel

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Full review →Website ↗

Semantic Kernel

Developer Tools

Microsoft's AI orchestration SDK for building agents with .NET, Python, and Java

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureMake (Integromat)Semantic Kernel
CategoryAutomation PlatformsDeveloper Tools
PricingFree + Core $9/moFree (open-source)
GitHub Stars—
✓ More stars
23k
PlatformsWebLinux, macOS, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ 1500+ integrations
  • ✓ AI modules
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Data stores
  • ✓ Error handling
  • ✓ Plugin system
  • ✓ Memory
  • ✓ Planner
  • ✓ Multi-language
  • ✓ Azure integration
Pros
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
  • + Enterprise-ready with Microsoft backing
  • + Multi-language (C#, Python, Java)
  • + Deep Azure OpenAI integration
  • + Plugin architecture for extensibility
Cons
  • − Pricing based on operations
  • − Can be expensive at scale
  • − Learning curve for advanced features
  • − Some integrations limited
  • − Heavy enterprise focus
  • − Verbose API compared to alternatives
Tags
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi
microsoftsdkenterprisedotnet

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Make (Integromat) vs NVIDIA Agent Skills →Semantic Kernel vs NVIDIA Agent Skills →Make (Integromat) vs Anthropic MCP →Semantic Kernel vs Anthropic MCP →Make (Integromat) vs Vercel AI SDK →Semantic Kernel vs Vercel AI SDK →Make (Integromat) vs Instructor →Semantic Kernel vs Instructor →Make (Integromat) vs Streamlit →Semantic Kernel vs Streamlit →Make (Integromat) vs Langflow →Semantic Kernel vs Langflow →