whatcani.runvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

whatcani.run

Local AI Infrastructure

Find which AI models can run locally on your hardware

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
Featurewhatcani.runCody
CategoryLocal AI InfrastructureCoding Assistants
PricingFreeFree + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars—
✓ More stars
5k
PlatformsWebmacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Hardware-based model discovery
  • ✓ Community benchmark data
  • ✓ Local LLM comparison
  • ✓ Token throughput references
  • ✓ Apple Silicon model lookup
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Clear utility for local AI buyers and tinkerers
  • + Good fit for high-intent local model searches
  • + Simple concept that is easy to explain
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Narrow use case
  • − Relies on community-submitted data quality
  • − Less useful for hosted API buyers
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
local llmmodel discoverybenchmarksapple siliconopen modelsinferencellm finder
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

whatcani.run vs Ollama →Cody vs Ollama →whatcani.run vs Cursor →Cody vs Cursor →whatcani.run vs Claude Code →Cody vs Claude Code →whatcani.run vs Cline →Cody vs Cline →whatcani.run vs Devin →Cody vs Devin →whatcani.run vs GitHub Copilot →Cody vs GitHub Copilot →