Claude CodevsDevin

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Claude Code

Coding Assistants

Featured

Anthropic coding agent CLI with dynamic workflows and background subagents

Devin

Coding Assistants

Featured

Autonomous AI software engineer by Cognition

FeatureClaude CodeDevin
CategoryCoding AssistantsCoding Assistants
PricingClaude plans and API usage$500/mo
GitHub Stars
More stars
128k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsWeb
Key Features
  • Terminal-native
  • Multi-file editing
  • Git integration
  • Codebase reasoning
  • Tool use
  • MCP support
  • Dynamic workflows
  • Background agents
  • Effort control
  • Autonomous coding
  • Bug fixing
  • Deployment
  • Learning from docs
  • Multi-step planning
Pros
  • + Terminal-native workflow
  • + Can execute shell commands
  • + Deep file system and codebase access
  • + MCP support for tool integrations
  • + Dynamic workflows can coordinate background agents on large tasks
  • + Fully autonomous coding agent
  • + Own development environment
  • + Can handle end-to-end tasks
  • + Learns from documentation
  • + Impressive demo results
Cons
  • Dynamic workflows are limited to Enterprise, Team, and Max plans
  • Token and plan limits can constrain large workflow runs
  • Autonomous code changes still need human review
  • Requires Anthropic or supported enterprise model access
  • $500/mo price point
  • Closed-source
  • Real-world performance varies
  • Limited availability
Tags
codingclianthropicclaudeagenticmcpmulti-agentworkflowssubagents
autonomouscodingagentsoftware-engineer

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons