DustvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Dust

AI Agent Frameworks

Platform for building and deploying AI assistants

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureDustCody
CategoryAI Agent FrameworksCoding Assistants
PricingFree + Pro $29/moFree + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars
3k
✓ More stars
5k
PlatformsWebmacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Data connections
  • ✓ Custom assistants
  • ✓ Team collaboration
  • ✓ Workflow builder
  • ✓ Enterprise
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Team-focused design
  • + Data connectors
  • + Enterprise security
  • + Custom assistants
  • + Clean interface
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Limited free tier
  • − Less flexible than frameworks
  • − Smaller community
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
assistantsenterpriseworkflowscollaboration
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Dust vs OpenClaw →Cody vs OpenClaw →Dust vs Claude Code →Cody vs Claude Code →Dust vs OpenAI Codex →Cody vs OpenAI Codex →Dust vs Cursor →Cody vs Cursor →Dust vs OpenHands →Cody vs OpenHands →Dust vs Microsoft AutoGen →Cody vs Microsoft AutoGen →