Make (Integromat)vsLetta

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Full review →Website ↗

Letta

AI Agent Frameworks

Build stateful AI agents with long-term memory

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureMake (Integromat)Letta
CategoryAutomation PlatformsAI Agent Frameworks
PricingFree + Core $9/moFree (open-source) + Cloud
GitHub Stars—
✓ More stars
13k
PlatformsWebLinux, macOS, Docker
Key Features
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ 1500+ integrations
  • ✓ AI modules
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Data stores
  • ✓ Error handling
  • ✓ Long-term memory
  • ✓ Stateful agents
  • ✓ Tool use
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Self-editing memory
Pros
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
  • + Solves long-term memory problem
  • + Self-editing memory
  • + Stateful agents
  • + Multi-model support
  • + Active research backing
Cons
  • − Pricing based on operations
  • − Can be expensive at scale
  • − Learning curve for advanced features
  • − Some integrations limited
  • − Complex memory management
  • − Performance overhead
  • − Rebranding confusion
  • − Still experimental
Tags
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi
memorystatefulagentsopen-source

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Make (Integromat) vs OpenClaw →Letta vs OpenClaw →Make (Integromat) vs OpenHands →Letta vs OpenHands →Make (Integromat) vs Microsoft AutoGen →Letta vs Microsoft AutoGen →Make (Integromat) vs AutoGPT →Letta vs AutoGPT →Make (Integromat) vs LangChain →Letta vs LangChain →Make (Integromat) vs Dify →Letta vs Dify →