Ollama Web UIvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Ollama Web UI

Chat Interfaces

ChatGPT-style interface for Ollama models

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureOllama Web UICody
CategoryChat InterfacesCoding Assistants
PricingFree (open-source)Free + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
55k
5k
PlatformsLinux, macOS, DockermacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Chat UI
  • ✓ RAG
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Plugins
  • ✓ Voice input
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Most popular self-hosted chat UI
  • + Supports Ollama + OpenAI APIs
  • + RAG and document upload
  • + Multi-user management
  • + Active development
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Duplicate entry — see Open WebUI
  • − Requires Docker
  • − Resource intensive
  • − Plugin ecosystem growing
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
chatollamalocalopen-source
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Ollama Web UI vs Claude Code →Cody vs Claude Code →Ollama Web UI vs OpenAI Codex →Cody vs OpenAI Codex →Ollama Web UI vs Cursor →Cody vs Cursor →Ollama Web UI vs Cline →Cody vs Cline →Ollama Web UI vs Devin →Cody vs Devin →Ollama Web UI vs GitHub Copilot →Cody vs GitHub Copilot →