PortkeyvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Portkey

LLM APIs & Inference

AI gateway for reliable and fast LLM applications

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
FeaturePortkeyCody
CategoryLLM APIs & InferenceCoding Assistants
PricingFree + Pro plansFree + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
6k
5k
PlatformsWeb, DockermacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ AI gateway
  • ✓ Fallbacks
  • ✓ Load balancing
  • ✓ Caching
  • ✓ Observability
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Automatic fallbacks
  • + Load balancing
  • + Request caching
  • + Observability built-in
  • + Open-source gateway
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Added infrastructure layer
  • − Learning curve
  • − Some features need Pro
  • − Latency overhead
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
gatewayreliabilityobservabilityapi
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Portkey vs Hugging Face →Cody vs Hugging Face →Portkey vs Cursor →Cody vs Cursor →Portkey vs Claude Code →Cody vs Claude Code →Portkey vs Cline →Cody vs Cline →Portkey vs Devin →Cody vs Devin →Portkey vs GitHub Copilot →Cody vs GitHub Copilot →