TabbyMLvsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

TabbyML

Coding Assistants

Self-hosted AI coding assistant

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureTabbyMLCody
CategoryCoding AssistantsCoding Assistants
PricingFree (open-source)Free + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
22k
5k
PlatformsLinux, macOS, DockermacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Self-hosted
  • ✓ Multiple models
  • ✓ RAG
  • ✓ IDE plugins
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Self-hosted and private
  • + Multiple IDE support
  • + Code completion + chat
  • + Team-friendly
  • + Open-source
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Requires server setup
  • − Needs GPU for good performance
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Less accurate than Copilot
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
codingself-hostedopen-sourcelocal
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

TabbyML vs Google Antigravity →Cody vs Google Antigravity →TabbyML vs Amazon Q Developer →Cody vs Amazon Q Developer →TabbyML vs Gemini Code Assist →Cody vs Gemini Code Assist →TabbyML vs GitHub Copilot →Cody vs GitHub Copilot →TabbyML vs OpenAI Codex →Cody vs OpenAI Codex →TabbyML vs Continue.dev →Cody vs Continue.dev →