TabninevsCody

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Tabnine

Coding Assistants

AI code assistant with whole-line and full-function completions

Full review →Website ↗

Cody

Coding Assistants

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph with codebase context

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureTabnineCody
CategoryCoding AssistantsCoding Assistants
PricingFree + Pro $12/moFree + Pro $9/mo
GitHub Stars—
✓ More stars
5k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsmacOS, Linux, Windows
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Privacy-first
  • ✓ On-premise option
  • ✓ Multi-language
  • ✓ Team learning
  • ✓ Codebase context
  • ✓ Code search
  • ✓ Autocomplete
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-repo
Pros
  • + Privacy-first (local processing)
  • + On-premise deployment option
  • + Team model training
  • + Wide IDE support
  • + Fast completions
  • + Deep codebase context
  • + Multi-repo understanding
  • + Code search integration
  • + Free tier available
  • + Privacy controls
Cons
  • − Less accurate than Copilot
  • − $12/mo for Pro
  • − Limited chat capabilities
  • − Smaller model than competitors
  • − Best with Sourcegraph (less useful standalone)
  • − Smaller model selection
  • − Enterprise pricing
  • − Less known than Copilot
Tags
codingcompletionprivacyenterprise
codingsourcegraphcontextsearch

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Tabnine vs Claude Code →Cody vs Claude Code →Tabnine vs OpenAI Codex →Cody vs OpenAI Codex →Tabnine vs Cursor →Cody vs Cursor →Tabnine vs Cline →Cody vs Cline →Tabnine vs Devin →Cody vs Devin →Tabnine vs GitHub Copilot →Cody vs GitHub Copilot →