Continue.devvsFlowise

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Continue.dev

Coding Assistants

Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains

Full review →Website ↗

Flowise

Automation Platforms

Drag-and-drop LLM flow builder

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureContinue.devFlowise
CategoryCoding AssistantsAutomation Platforms
PricingFree (open-source)Free (open-source) + Cloud
GitHub Stars
20k
✓ More stars
35k
PlatformsmacOS, Linux, WindowsmacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker
Key Features
  • ✓ Code completion
  • ✓ Chat
  • ✓ Multi-model
  • ✓ Custom commands
  • ✓ Context providers
  • ✓ Visual flow builder
  • ✓ LangChain integration
  • ✓ Chatbot builder
  • ✓ Agent flows
  • ✓ API endpoints
  • ✓ Custom tools
Pros
  • + Open-source Copilot alternative
  • + Works with any model
  • + Custom commands and context
  • + VS Code + JetBrains support
  • + Privacy-friendly
  • + No-code visual builder
  • + LangChain/LlamaIndex integration
  • + Easy deployment
  • + Good for prototyping
  • + Active community
Cons
  • − Less polished than Copilot
  • − Setup required for best experience
  • − Completion quality depends on model
  • − Smaller community
  • − Limited for complex custom logic
  • − Can be buggy with some nodes
  • − Documentation gaps
  • − Less flexible than code
Tags
codingopen-sourcevscodejetbrains
open-sourceno-codelangchainchatbotvisual

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Continue.dev vs Google Antigravity →Flowise vs Google Antigravity →Continue.dev vs Amazon Q Developer →Flowise vs Amazon Q Developer →Continue.dev vs Gemini Code Assist →Flowise vs Gemini Code Assist →Continue.dev vs Make (Integromat) →Flowise vs Make (Integromat) →Continue.dev vs GitHub Copilot →Flowise vs GitHub Copilot →Continue.dev vs OpenAI Codex →Flowise vs OpenAI Codex →