Make (Integromat)vsGroq

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Groq

LLM APIs & Inference

The fastest AI inference platform — LPU-powered, 1000+ tokens/sec

FeatureMake (Integromat)Groq
CategoryAutomation PlatformsLLM APIs & Inference
PricingFree + Core $9/moFree tier available, pay-per-token for production
GitHub Stars
PlatformsWebWeb
Key Features
  • Visual builder
  • 1500+ integrations
  • AI modules
  • Webhooks
  • Data stores
  • Error handling
  • LPU hardware — custom chips for inference, not repurposed GPUs
  • GPT OSS 120B at 500 tok/s ($0.15/M input)
  • GPT OSS 20B at 1000 tok/s ($0.075/M input)
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B at 750 tok/s with 131K context + vision
  • Qwen3-32B at 400 tok/s with 131K context
  • Compound AI systems with web search + code execution
  • Whisper transcription ($0.04-0.11/hour)
  • OpenAI-compatible API — drop-in replacement
  • Free developer tier: 250-300K TPM, 1K RPM
Pros
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
  • + Fastest inference available (500-1000 tok/s)
  • + Free tier with generous limits (250K+ tokens/min)
  • + OpenAI-compatible API — swap one line of code
  • + Latest open-source models (GPT OSS, Llama 4, Qwen3)
  • + Compound AI for agentic workflows (search + code exec)
Cons
  • Pricing based on operations
  • Can be expensive at scale
  • Learning curve for advanced features
  • Some integrations limited
  • Cloud-only — cannot self-host LPU hardware
  • Rate limits on free tier (1K RPM)
  • Smaller model catalog than running locally via Ollama
Tags
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi
inferencefastfreehardware

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons