Make (Integromat)vsn8n

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Full review →Website ↗

n8n

Automation Platforms

Open-source workflow automation with built-in AI capabilities

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureMake (Integromat)n8n
CategoryAutomation PlatformsAutomation Platforms
PricingFree + Core $9/moFree (self-hosted), cloud from $20/mo
GitHub Stars—
✓ More stars
52k
PlatformsWebmacOS, Linux, Windows, Docker
Key Features
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ 1500+ integrations
  • ✓ AI modules
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Data stores
  • ✓ Error handling
  • ✓ 400+ integrations (APIs, databases, SaaS)
  • ✓ Native AI nodes (LLM, vector store, RAG chains)
  • ✓ Visual drag-and-drop workflow builder
  • ✓ Self-hostable via Docker (full data control)
  • ✓ Webhook triggers, cron schedules, event-driven
  • ✓ JavaScript/Python code nodes for custom logic
  • ✓ Credential management and encryption
  • ✓ Active community (52K+ GitHub stars)
Pros
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
  • + Self-hostable (full data control)
  • + 400+ integrations
  • + Visual workflow builder
  • + Native AI/LLM nodes
  • + Active community
Cons
  • − Pricing based on operations
  • − Can be expensive at scale
  • − Learning curve for advanced features
  • − Some integrations limited
  • − Resource-heavy for self-hosting
  • − Learning curve for complex workflows
Tags
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi
automationworkflowno-codeself-hostedintegrations

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Make (Integromat) vs Langflow →n8n vs Langflow →Make (Integromat) vs Dify →n8n vs Dify →Make (Integromat) vs Flowise →n8n vs Flowise →Make (Integromat) vs Zapier →n8n vs Zapier →