Make (Integromat)vsZapier

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Full review →Website ↗

Zapier

Automation Platforms

Connect your apps and automate workflows

Full review →Website ↗
FeatureMake (Integromat)Zapier
CategoryAutomation PlatformsAutomation Platforms
PricingFree + Core $9/moFree + Starter $19.99/mo
GitHub Stars——
PlatformsWebWeb
Key Features
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ 1500+ integrations
  • ✓ AI modules
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Data stores
  • ✓ Error handling
  • ✓ 7000+ integrations
  • ✓ AI chatbots
  • ✓ Multi-step Zaps
  • ✓ Filters & paths
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Tables
Pros
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
  • + 6,000+ app integrations
  • + Easiest automation tool to use
  • + Reliable and well-tested
  • + Great documentation
  • + AI-powered Zap builder
Cons
  • − Pricing based on operations
  • − Can be expensive at scale
  • − Learning curve for advanced features
  • − Some integrations limited
  • − Expensive for high volume
  • − Limited logic compared to Make/n8n
  • − No self-hosting option
  • − Per-task pricing adds up
Tags
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowpopular

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Make (Integromat) vs n8n →Zapier vs n8n →Make (Integromat) vs Langflow →Zapier vs Langflow →Make (Integromat) vs Dify →Zapier vs Dify →Make (Integromat) vs Flowise →Zapier vs Flowise →