PortkeyvsMake (Integromat)

Full side-by-side comparison — features, pricing, platforms, and which one wins in 2026.

Portkey

LLM APIs & Inference

AI gateway for reliable and fast LLM applications

Full review →Website ↗

Make (Integromat)

Automation Platforms

Visual automation platform connecting 1500+ apps

Full review →Website ↗
FeaturePortkeyMake (Integromat)
CategoryLLM APIs & InferenceAutomation Platforms
PricingFree + Pro plansFree + Core $9/mo
GitHub Stars
✓ More stars
6k
—
PlatformsWeb, DockerWeb
Key Features
  • ✓ AI gateway
  • ✓ Fallbacks
  • ✓ Load balancing
  • ✓ Caching
  • ✓ Observability
  • ✓ Visual builder
  • ✓ 1500+ integrations
  • ✓ AI modules
  • ✓ Webhooks
  • ✓ Data stores
  • ✓ Error handling
Pros
  • + Automatic fallbacks
  • + Load balancing
  • + Request caching
  • + Observability built-in
  • + Open-source gateway
  • + 1,500+ app integrations
  • + Powerful visual editor
  • + Complex logic support
  • + Reliable execution
  • + Good error handling
Cons
  • − Added infrastructure layer
  • − Learning curve
  • − Some features need Pro
  • − Latency overhead
  • − Pricing based on operations
  • − Can be expensive at scale
  • − Learning curve for advanced features
  • − Some integrations limited
Tags
gatewayreliabilityobservabilityapi
automationno-codeintegrationsworkflowapi

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to compare picker

Related Comparisons

Portkey vs Hugging Face →Make (Integromat) vs Hugging Face →Portkey vs Dify →Make (Integromat) vs Dify →Portkey vs n8n →Make (Integromat) vs n8n →Portkey vs Flowise →Make (Integromat) vs Flowise →Portkey vs Langflow →Make (Integromat) vs Langflow →Portkey vs LiteLLM →Make (Integromat) vs LiteLLM →